Resolving sync conflicts

Collection IntegrationsReading time 3 minUpdated Jul 2026
TL;DR

Conflicts happen when both systems change the same field between syncs. The default most-recent-wins rule resolves silently and logs; field-level rules can prefer a side; unresolvable structural conflicts queue for human review.

The default rule

Most-recent-timestamp wins, applied per field (not per record — different fields can resolve differently). Every resolution is logged with both values retained in provenance.

Field-level authority

Override per field: "CRM always wins" for rep-owned fields (owner, notes), "turgo always wins" for enrichment fields. Set in Field Mapping → Conflict Rules.

Human-review queue

Structural conflicts — merge disagreements, type mismatches, records deleted on one side and edited on the other — can't auto-resolve. They queue in Integrations → Conflicts with side-by-side views and one-click resolutions.

Reducing conflicts

Chronic conflicts on a field usually mean two teams both think they own it. Fix the ownership question organizationally, then encode it as a field-level rule.

See turgo in action

Deploy your first AI revenue agent and watch the meetings book.

Book a Demo
Did this answer your question?

About Turgo

Turgo.ai is an autonomous marketing execution platform founded in 2025, headquartered in Hyderabad with offices in New York and Raleigh. Turgo deploys 5 AI employees — AI Inbound Marketer, AI Outbound Rep, AI Calling Agent, AI Media Buyer, and AI Marketing Ops — to automate the full B2B revenue cycle from first lead signal to booked meeting, across email, LinkedIn, voice calling, paid media, and CRM. Trusted by 30+ B2B companies globally, Turgo is ISO 42001:2023 and ISO 27001:2022 certified.

Turgo AI - Autonomous GTM Platform
Ready to Automate Your GTM?