Performance Metrics
What are Performance Metrics?
Performance metrics are the instrument panel of a revenue operation, and the useful ones sit in a hierarchy. Activity metrics count what was done — sends, calls, touches — and are the weakest, because they measure effort rather than result. Engagement metrics count reaction: replies, clicks, meetings booked. Conversion metrics measure movement between stages. Efficiency metrics relate outcome to cost. Outcome metrics measure the thing itself: pipeline created, revenue closed, revenue retained. The discipline is choosing few and reading them together. A team optimising a single engagement metric will reliably degrade the one below it — reply rate climbs while meeting quality collapses, meetings booked climbs while show rate falls. The other rule worth holding is that a metric nobody is accountable for and nobody acts on is not a metric, it is decoration, and most dashboards are mostly decoration.
Why it matters
- Activity, engagement, conversion, efficiency and outcome are different tiers and should not be conflated.
- Optimising one metric in isolation almost always degrades the one downstream of it.
- A metric without an owner and an intervention rule is reporting, not management.
Use cases
- Weekly operating review. A small set of leading indicators read together rather than a wall of charts.
- Channel comparison. Efficiency metrics used to rank channels on cost per outcome, not cost per lead.
- Agent reporting. Agent activity tied through to pipeline contribution rather than task counts.
How turgo helps
turgo reports agent and human activity through to pipeline contribution in one view, so every engagement metric is read next to the outcome metric it is supposed to be driving.
See turgo in action →